Skip to main content

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers - Performance

Programme in a nutshell

Concrete examples of achievements

65
were applications
received between 2014 and 2022, including 11 applications received in 2021 and 2022, excluding those withdrawn or rejected.
59 347
workers
were targeted between 2014 and 2022, including 5 179 workers targeted in applications received in 2021 and 2022.
4 099
young people
not in employment, education or training were targeted between 2014 and 2020.
EUR 211 800 263
in contributions from the EGF
was requested by 12 Member States between 2014 and 2022, including about EUR 38 million requested through the 2021 and 2022 applications.
60%
is the average rate
of beneficiaries who found employment following an EGF intervention between 2014 and 2020.

(*) Key achievements in the table state which period they relate to. Many come from the implementation of the predecessor programmes under the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework. This is expected and is due to the multiannual life cycle of EU programmes and the projects they finance, where results often follow only after completion of the programmes.

Budget for 2021-2027

(*) In addition, an amount of EUR 16.04 million was used in 2021 from the 2014-2020 programming period to cover EGF cases that were submitted by the Member States at the end of 2020 but paid from the 2021 budget.

Rationale and design of the programme

With a view to achieving economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU, it is necessary to develop a coordinated strategy for employment. This strategy should particularly focus on the promotion of a skilled, trained and adaptable workforce as well as on labour markets’ responsiveness to economic change. To this end, the Union shall contribute to a high level of employment by supporting and, if necessary, complementing Member State’s action through the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers (EGF) to co-finance measures to support redundant workers in case of major restructuring events. These events, by their scale and effects, cause a significant impact and can test the limits of what regular national labour market programmes are able to provide to assist displaced workers.

Budget

Budget programming (million EUR):

  2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Financial programming 181.3 201.3 205.4 209.5 213.7 217.9 222.3 1 451.4
NextGenerationEU                
Decommitments made available again (*)               N/A
Contributions from other countries and entities                
Total  181.3  201.3  205.4  209.5  213.7  217.9  222.3  1 451.4

(*) Only Article 15(3) of the financial regulation.

 

Budget performance – implementation

Multiannual cumulative implementation rate at the end of 2022 (million EUR):

  Implementation 2021-2027 Budget Implementation rate
Commitments 35.9 1 451.4 2.5%
Payments 34.3   2.4%

 

Annual voted budget implementation (million EUR)(1):

  Commitments Payments
  Voted budget implementation Initial voted budget Voted budget implementation Initial voted budget
2021 8.0 197.4 6.6 20.0
2022 27.9 201.3 22.3 25.0

(1) Voted appropriations (C1) only.

Contribution to horizontal priorities

Green budgeting

Contribution to green budgeting priorities (million EUR):

  Implementation Estimates Total contribution % of the 2021–2027 budget
  2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027    
Climate mainstreaming 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Biodiversity mainstreaming 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
Clean air 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0

Not applicable to the EGF

 

Gender

Contribution to gender equality (million EUR) (*):

Gender score 2021 2022 Total
0* 8.0 27.9 35.9

(*) Based on the applied gender contribution methodology, the following scores are attributed at the most granular level of intervention possible:
- 2: interventions the principal objective of which is to improve gender equality;
- 1: interventions that have gender equality as an important and deliberate objective but not as the main reason for the intervention;
- 0: non-targeted interventions (interventions that are expected to have no significant bearing on gender equality);

- 0*: score to be assigned to interventions with a likely but not yet clear positive impact on gender equality.

 

The EGF regulation provides for the Commission and the Member States to ensure that equality between men and women and the integration of the gender perspective are integral parts of and promoted during all stages of the implementation of the financial contribution from the EGF. To that end, the Member States formally confirm the respect of this principle at the time of application, when they provide gender-disaggregated information on the workers targeted for assistance. In case of doubt, the Commission requests that Member States provide further information on the gender aspect in the course of its assessment of an application. This is, however, a general principle applied across the implementation and final reporting of the EGF cases, and estimating budget contributions is not relevant. Evaluations of the EGF always include an analysis of both gender disaggregated data and qualitative information (beneficiary surveys, interview with implementers, etc.) regarding possible gender discrimination. In the course of EGF evaluations, external contractors conduct case studies on each EGF case, and they are also asked to take the gender perspective into account. Past evaluations did not detect gender discrimination in either the delivery of measures or the targeting of beneficiaries. Moreover, in many cases, authorities aim to help participants overcome gender stereotypes when looking for a new job.

Between 2014 and 2016, the greatest number of redundant workers benefiting from EGF support came from sectors that traditionally employ more men than women (automotive, computing, electronics, machinery and building construction). As a consequence, most workers made redundant and then targeted by EGF applications were male (75% men versus 25% women). However, from 2017, a significant number of redundancies took place in sectors that employ high numbers of women (retail trade, call centres, clothing, financial services and tourism-related activities). Therefore, 57% of those targeted by the EGF between 2017 and 2020 were men and 43% were women. In 31% of all EGF cases, women represent at least 40% of the dismissed/targeted workers, and in 20% of cases they represent more than 50%.

Between 2021 and 2022, many redundancies occurred in sectors that employ a high proportion of men (metalworking, air transport, manufacture of motor vehicles, transport equipment, electrical equipment), hence 65% of those targeted by the EGF were men and 35% were women.

 

Digital

Contribution to digital transition (million EUR):

  2021 2022 Total % of the total 2021-2027 implementation
Digital contribution 0 0 0 0

 

The EGF does not have any indicators that specifically measure the contribution to the digital transition. The indicators are general result indicators. However, the dissemination of digital skills is a horizontal element for the design of coordinated packages of measures. The need for and level of training is adapted to the qualifications and skills of each beneficiary. In theory, every beneficiary is thus expected to have received some sort of digital skills training.

 

Budget performance – outcomes

  • The main sources of information on the EGF’s results are (1) the final reports submitted by the Member States, 7 months after the end of implementation, and (2) the beneficiary surveys, which are conducted 6 months after the implementation of the case.
  • Even though the EGF’s main aim is sustainable reintegration into quality employment, the mere comparison of reintegration rates is not sufficient to measure the performance of the EGF. This is due, among other reasons, to differences in the characteristics of the beneficiaries targeted and in the socioeconomic situations of the regions affected. Therefore, beneficiary surveys were introduced as a new tool in the 2021-2027 period. Beneficiary surveys will help assess the extent to which the assistance offered had an impact on the perceived change in the employability of beneficiaries or, for those who have already found employment, on the quality of the employment found (e.g. in terms of changes in working hours). Such information will be broken down by gender, age group, education level and level of professional experience. Furthermore, by broadening the scope of the EGF and by making the application procedure easier and faster in the current programming period, the fund is expected to be more inclusive and to reach more displaced workers in need of assistance.
  • Considering the delayed start of the 2021-2027 programming period, and taking into account that the implementation of an EGF case takes 24 months, the aforementioned information, which is necessary to assess the EGF’s performance, is only expected by mid 2024.

Sustainable development goals

Contribution to the sustainable development goals

SDGs the programme contributes to Example
SDG4
Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
In the 2019 ‘Goodyear’ EGF case in Germany, 60% of the targeted workers had no suitable qualification and used to hold elementary occupations (including a high number of people with migrant background). Backed by EGF with EUR 2 165 231, one third of 622 beneficiaries upskilled and improved their employment level. Overall, 58% of the workers had found a new job while the other 5% were participating in upskilling measures for a longer duration (e.g. getting a vocational qualification), by the reporting date.
SDG5
Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
The EGF is helping to achieve gender equality by providing support to all dismissed workers. Since 2017, a significant number of redundancies took place in sectors with high numbers of employed women (retail trade, call centre, wearing apparel, financial services and tourism-related activities). For example, in the 2017 ‘Retail’ case in Finland 1 173 women (representing 80% of total beneficiaries) were helped by EGF. EUR 2.5 million were mobilised from the EGF to support the ICT and language training, job and career coaching and job-seeking training. Overall, 84% of the beneficiaries had found a new job at the end of the implementation period.
SDG8
Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
In NUTS 2 level regions where youth unemployment rates are at least 20%, the EGF may provide personalised services to young people not in employment, education or training. For example, in cases implemented between 2017 and 2019 in Belgium (‘Caterpillar’ case, 1 931 beneficiaries and EUR 1.6 million of EGF funding mobilised), and in Spain (Castilla y León mining of coal case, 396 beneficiaries and EUR 1 million of EGF funding mobilised), the support offered to the young people targeted provided them with the assistance that they would not have received through national mainstream services.
SDG10
Reduce inequalities within and among countries

The EGF is an emergency fund and is only mobilised in redundancy events that have a significant impact on the regional economy. By offering upskilling measures to workers made redundant, the EGF helps regions to offer measures to make their workers ready for future labour market needs, thereby fostering economic growth.

Some EGF cases include measures that improve labour mobility of displaced workers. For instance, in the ‘Microsoft 2’ case in Finland (883 beneficiaries and EUR 3.5 million of EGF funding mobilised) implemented between 2017 and 2019 the measures offered to the dismissed workers supported labour mobility in cooperation with the European Job Mobility Portal (EURES) services (i.e. foreign job advertisements and the exchange of experiences in online meetings).

Archived versions from previous years

European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers PPS